UN denies 'aggressor' label as new peace talks emerge
The American resolution regarding the war in Ukraine was recognized by Russia's ambassador to the UN, Vasily Nebenzya, as the first constructive step toward peace. Nebenzya simultaneously accused Europe of thwarting efforts to achieve peace.
Many reports from Russian media are likely untrue. Such reports may be part of an information war from the Russian Federation.
The Russian ambassador expressed satisfaction with the US initiative, which describes the conflict as a "Russian-Ukrainian war" and does not call Russia an aggressor. According to Nebenzya, this is the first Security Council document that focuses on the path to peace rather than deepening the conflict. In his statement, he accused Europe of attempting to sabotage talks between Russia and the United States.
Nebenzya claimed that Europe, currently undergoing militarization, is the only global actor determined to prolong the war and is likely to resist any practical efforts toward resolving the conflict.
Nebenzya appealed to all who desire lasting peace in Ukraine not to let "the overenthusiastic Kiev prince and his puppeteers" disrupt efforts made by Russia and the United States. He emphasized that cooperation between these two countries is crucial for achieving lasting peace in the region.
China on engagement in peace talks
China, which also voted for the American resolution, supported the "agreement between the US and Russia to start peace talks" but noted that all interested parties should be involved and that peace should be fair.
Five European countries (the United Kingdom, France, Greece, Slovenia, and Denmark) that abstained from voting were the most critical of the American resolution. South Korea also expressed regret over the rejection of European amendments—calling the Russian war an invasion and demanding a just peace and respect for Ukraine's territorial integrity—although it ultimately voted for the American document.
Not everyone supported the resolution
French diplomat de Riviere mentioned that France was "fully committed to peace in Ukraine, we call for comprehensive, just and lasting peace, and certainly not for capitulation of the victim," explaining the lack of support for the American resolution that did not point to the aggressor in the conflict.
"This is why there can be no equivalence between Russia and Ukraine in how this council refers to this war," he emphasized.
Delegates from the United Kingdom, Slovenia, and Denmark also backed this stance. British Ambassador Barbara Woodward stressed that Russia could bring about peace immediately by ending its aggression and withdrawing its forces from all Ukrainian territory.
Resolution adopted by the UN Security Council
Ten of the 15 countries voted for the resolution, while another five - all European countries - abstained from voting.
The resolution is a short text that only expresses regret over the tragic loss of life in the conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, does not condemn the Russian invasion, and reiterates that the primary goal of the UN is to maintain international peace and security and to resolve disputes peacefully. It contains only three paragraphs, calling for lasting peace between Russia and Ukraine and a quick resolution.
Earlier, the same American draft resolution was amended at the request of European countries, adopting the same amendments that the US vetoed during Monday's Security Council meeting. The General Assembly also adopted a Ukrainian resolution condemning the aggression and calling on Russia to withdraw its forces.
Read also:
