West debates long-range strikes on Russian targets

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) reports that "there are at least 250 military and paramilitary objects in Russia within range of ATACMS missiles." Analysts emphasize that the West's approval of using such long-range weapons against targets in Russia could significantly weaken Moscow's military capabilities. The USA has an entirely different opinion.

Discussions about using long-range weapons in Russia are gaining momentum, especially after the Ukrainian attack in Kursk Oblast.

In July, Radosław Sikorski, the former head of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, appealed to Western allies to lift restrictions on Kyiv's use of these weapons. Sikorski argued that the Ukrainian army should be able to attack strategic targets in Russia, which could expedite ending the conflict. However, not everyone agrees with this opinion.

Representatives of U.S. President Joe Biden's administration are more skeptical of the strategy mentioned. One anonymous national security official stated that the Russian armed forces had already transferred most of their military aircraft from airbases near the Ukrainian border to safer airports deeper within the country. As a result, the Russian air force is becoming less accessible to Ukrainian attacks.

Despite reservations from the USA, experts from ISW believe that potential attacks on Russian military targets deeper in the country could significantly disrupt Russian military operations. Russia uses these areas to build infrastructure supporting military operations against Ukraine, making them valuable targets. Reducing the activity of the Russian Air Force is just one aspect to consider. It is also important to weaken other elements of the Russian military infrastructure.

The Institute indicates that in Russia, there is a wide range of military and paramilitary targets that could be attacked if Ukraine received the green light from its Western allies.

ISW assesses that there are at least 250 military and paramilitary objects in Russia within range of ATACMS missiles that the United States has provided Ukraine - states the Institute for the Study of War

This decision could force Russia to disperse its air defense resources and support over a larger area, weakening its defense capabilities.

Regardless of how further decisions unfold, this topic will certainly be one of the key elements of the debate over the future of the war in Ukraine.