Trump's WHO exit risks global pandemic response delays
Professor Robert Ostergard from the University of Nevada warns in an interview with the Polish Press Agency that President Donald Trump's announcement of the United States' withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) is a dangerous move for the US and other countries. In his opinion, this decision may weaken and delay the global response to future pandemics.
President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the WHO has sparked widespread criticism. Experts warn of negative consequences for the US and the rest of the world. Professor Robert Ostergard from the University of Nevada emphasizes that the decision could hinder and postpone the global response to future pandemics.
Trump: "WHO is ripping us off"
Trump justified his decision to leave the WHO for financial reasons. "The World Health Organization is ripping us off," the US President announced.
The United States is the largest sponsor of the WHO, contributing over $1.2 billion to the organization's budget for 2022-2023. Germany contributed $856 million, and China contributed only $156 million. Despite this, Professor Ostergard believes that investing in the WHO is crucial, especially for developing countries that are the source of many health crises.
The United States does pay more, but that's because poorer countries cannot contribute as much. Maintaining membership in the WHO is crucial, especially for developing countries, as many global health crises originate from these areas, as shown by incidents like Ebola, COVID-19, and bird flu, said the expert, quoted by the Polish Press Agency.
Experts talk about the threat to public health
Experts like Kavelle Christie warn that the US's withdrawal from the WHO may lead to isolation in key areas such as vaccine distribution and early disease detection.
Christie emphasizes that "public health transcends borders," and the COVID-19 pandemic was a stark reminder. She points out the many unknown viruses that could trigger another pandemic.
Impact on international cooperation
The decision to withdraw the US from the WHO may also affect efforts to eliminate AIDS and the development of vaccines and medications. "Regulations for pharmaceutical products often rely on data exchange and global best practices that the WHO helps coordinate," notes Christie. Without these partnerships, the US risks slower innovation and a loss of trust in its expertise.
The United States, as a founding member of the WHO, has played a key role in the organization since its establishment in 1948. Currently, WHO includes 194 countries, and Trump's decision could have far-reaching consequences for global public health. "It's not a matter of if it will happen, but when it will happen," emphasizes Professor Ostergard, referring to potential future pandemics.
Trump's decision (he signed the order just a few hours after being sworn in) surprised no one. The US President had long been critical of the WHO, and his administration began the process of leaving the organization five years ago. It was Joe Biden who reversed Trump's decision upon taking office.
